Solar Was Popular. Then the Utilities' PR Machine Went to Work. It's Time to Set the Record Straight.
In the early 2000s, solar was hailed as a viable fossil fuel alternative and deployment increased at a record pace in the US. That began to change after a 2013 report commissioned by the Edison Electric Institute — the investor-owned utilities' own trade association — framed distributed solar as a competitive threat to utility revenue rather than a grid asset.
The "cost shift" narrative born in that report — that wealthy solar owners shift costs onto everyone else — has since been repeated in utility-funded studies, regulatory filings, and media placements nationwide, shaping outcomes ever since, most visibly in California's NEM 3.0 decision.
The evidence tells a different story. Solar is one of the cheapest sources of new electricity generation, and it can be deployed faster than almost any other clean energy resource. Rigorous analysis of the "cost shift" shows it is far smaller — and far more contested — than utilities claim. The New Solar Wave exists to perform research and make evidence accessible to journalists, regulators, educators, and the public.
A Myth-vs-Evidence Report on Rooftop Solar Economics
This research builds the citable, open-source evidentiary base that journalists, regulators, and educators can draw on directly. It:
Plain-language explainers, data visualizations, and social content that translate the research for a general audience — paired with media partnerships and op-ed placements at outlets with large reader bases.
A speaker series and webinars for community groups, students, and local officials who want to understand solar economics without the spin.
Support independent solar research, partner on education, or request a briefing — there's a place for you in restoring the public record on solar's value.